What the motion to disqualify Judge Peterson seeks
The motion seeks orders from Chief Judge as Judge Peterson’s impartiality in this case can reasonably be questioned The Chief Judge is asked to balance
Author: Nona Tobin
Relief from fraud on the court can only be granted after a proper hearing
No NRS 40.110 hearing has ever been held 1. When the summons has been served as provided in NRS 40.100 and the time for answering has expired, the
The A-21-828840-C interpleader action was filed in bad faith
The facts of this case, considered within the context of the Nevada case law articulated below in the www.casetext.com AI-assisted legal research memo, show the
Nevada HOA homeowners need of Bill of Rights to ensure anti-homeowner bills like SB 417 don’t pass
CAI lobbyists who are also HOA attorneys have a major conflict of interest Nevada has long had many HOA homeowner protections built into state law,
Judge Peterson forgot I was the victim and thinks Scow did nothing wrong keeping the excess proceeds from the HOA sale for 8+years
What the law requires What interpleader standard is “Legal Standard “In an interpleader action, the ‘stakeholder’ of a sum of money sues all those who
Judge Peterson’s bias gifted the case to my opponents
Steven Scow filed the interpleader action knowing it was meritless Link to previous blogs (ScaStrong.com/tag/interpleader) on how this interpleader action was filed in bad faith
Judge Peterson’s impartiality can reasonably be questioned by declaring Red Rock LLC was a party
The court can’t render judgment for or against a non-party Moore v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev., No. 69367, at *2 (Nev. App. Jan.
Who controls CAI and its 50 state HOA lobbying committees?
HOAGOV reprint Who controls CAI and its 50 state HOA lobbying committees? by George K. Staropoli, first published 3/11/12 I believe this shows that a
CAI minuscule minority dominates public policy again by pushing anti HOA owner SB 417
How does CAI convince legislators to take actions that are detrimental to HOA homeowner rights? CAI uses attorneys as lobbyists pretending to be fiduciaries speaking