Vexatious litigant label was attached to the wrong parties
Court records show that the interpleader action was meritless as it was filed when I was the sole party with a recorded claim after June
Tag: vexatious litigant restrictive order
Would a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts perceive bias or a lack of impartiality?
Transcript analysis 2/2/23 hearing Analysis by Casetext.com Co-counsel AI For the last four years, I have subscribed to a legal services research service found on
Vexatious litigant order in absentia
2/2/23 Court hearing @ 11:15AM, not 10:55 AM Minutes served @4:44Pm wrongly reported “chambers” – not open court “No parties present” – not Steven Scow
My previous complaint to the NCJD was NOT investigated, and so history repeated itself two years later.
January 28, 2021 I complained to the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline about Judge Kishner Summary of 1/28/21 video to NCJD I have been in
Court records and documentary evidence to support motion to disqualify Judge Peterson
On 4/26/23, I filed a motion to disqualify Judge Jessica K. Peterson from this case pursuant to NRS 1.230 and NCJC 2.11 on the grounds
Three ways of demonstrating a lack of judicial impartiality
Judge Peterson showed bias against me by declaring I was a vexatious litigant in absentia, the rules don’t apply to my opponents, and Red Rock
My opponents’ first improper attempt for a vexatious litigant restrictive order failed.
January 19, 2022 court hearing Link to Transcript My motive for requesting a ruling based on evidence was proper. In December 2021 I filed a
Complaints against Sun City Anthem attorneys have not been investigated
My daunting experience from 2017 until now strongly attests to the fact that Community Association Institute (CAI) lobbyists – attorneys representing HOAs, HOA debt collectors,
On 12/19/22, I filed a motion for an order to show cause why written findings of attorney misconduct should not be forwarded to the State Bar
Link to PDF Table summarizes the uninvestigated allegations of attorney misconduct Doc. No. Uninvestigated Ethics Complaints to the State Bar of Nevada 22-08189 2/23/22 Verified
A-21-828840-C Orders are “void, not voidable merely”
“Disqualification occurs when the facts creating disqualification arise, not when disqualification is established.”); see also Hoff v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 79 Nev. 108, 110,