What the motion to disqualify Judge Peterson seeks
The motion seeks orders from Chief Judge as Judge Peterson’s impartiality in this case can reasonably be questioned The Chief Judge is asked to balance
Tag: judicial misconduct
Relief from fraud on the court can only be granted after a proper hearing
No NRS 40.110 hearing has ever been held 1. When the summons has been served as provided in NRS 40.100 and the time for answering has expired, the
Judge Peterson forgot I was the victim and thinks Scow did nothing wrong keeping the excess proceeds from the HOA sale for 8+years
What the law requires What interpleader standard is “Legal Standard “In an interpleader action, the ‘stakeholder’ of a sum of money sues all those who
Judge Peterson’s bias gifted the case to my opponents
Steven Scow filed the interpleader action knowing it was meritless Link to previous blogs (ScaStrong.com/tag/interpleader) on how this interpleader action was filed in bad faith
Judges are expected to promote confidence in the judiciary by performing fairly and impartially
Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct (NCJC) provisions implicated in my motion to disqualify Judge Peterson. Rule 1.1. Compliance With the Law. A judge shall comply with the law,
Violation of NCJC 2.6 as grounds for disqualification
I contend that Judge Peterson violated NCJC 2.6 by Legal authorities supporting the proposition that a judge must allow a party to present evidence to
January 19, 2022 Transcript Analysis
Link to PDF of the 1/19/22 Transcript Analysis by Casetext.com Co-counsel AI For the last four years, I have subscribed to a legal services research
What allegations of attorney misconduct were made against Steven Scow, the attorney for Red Rock Financial Services?
Link to 12/19/22 Request For Judicial Notice of 346-page verified, evidence-backed, uninvestigated (pending court order) complaint to the State Bar and 50-page draft civil complaint
Nevada law supports the right of every litigant to an evidence-based adjudication of claims by an impartial judge
The case law in Nevada generally supports the proposition that every litigant has the right to an evidence-based adjudication of their claims by an impartial
SB 417 and vexatious litigant restrictive order are a two-prong approach to take away all my rights
Vexatious litigant restrictive order limits my rights to NRS 116.4117 civil action 3/28/23 The court declared that my filings requesting written finding of attorney misconduct