SCA’S ATTORNEY also is LOBBYIST against you the homeowner. RED FLAG!
This is a re-print of an email that was circulating this weekend about SB 417, a very anti-homeowner bill that has tentative approval going forward
Owners should ALWAYS come first!
This is a re-print of an email that was circulating this weekend about SB 417, a very anti-homeowner bill that has tentative approval going forward
Litigation is expensive and wasteful There are tons of reasons why filing a lawsuit is not the most effective way to resolve disputes. So, Sun
The GM is to blame for the big bill – not the SCA owners who must pay it This huge expense is still climbing, but
After a relaxing couple of weeks in Cabo, I have been immediately hit by how badly SCA homeowners are being treated by our highly compensated
Last June I did not think passing around recall petitions was a good idea. I thought it was a fool’s errand – disruptive and doomed
Some people have told me they are voting no on the removal election because they are under the impression that it will cost between $50,000
As you’ve no doubt noticed, the instructions on voting are confusing and the normal voting procedures have been changed. Here are some answers to the
Help for Sun City Anthem homeowners who may not have understood that Ovist & Howard, CPAs’, letter was actually a ballot to vote to remove
This open letter is republished with permission from Favil West, President of the Foundation Assisting Seniors, who formerly served as a SCA Board member for
The following essay was written by Jim Mayfield, former member and Vice-President of the Sun City Anthem Board, and is republished here with his permission.