Standard for granting NRCP 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss with prejudice
Warner v. Dillon, 92 Nev. 677, 679 (Nev. 1976) (“In determining whether to grant a motion to dismiss, the court is required to accept as
Category: A-21-828840-C
The A-21-828840-C interpleader action was filed in bad faith
The facts of this case, considered within the context of the Nevada case law articulated below in the www.casetext.com AI-assisted legal research memo, show the
A-21-828840-C Orders are “void, not voidable merely”
“Disqualification occurs when the facts creating disqualification arise, not when disqualification is established.”); see also Hoff v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 79 Nev. 108, 110,
Tobin motion for summary judgment vs. Red Rock, Nationstar & Wells Fargo
Comes now, counter-claimant/ cross-claimant Nona Tobin, an individual, in proper person, to hereby move for summary judgment vs. counter-defendant Red Rock Financial Services, a partnership,
Tobin 4/26/21 Opposition to Red Rock’s 4/16/21 motion to dismiss per NRCP 12(b)(5)
Comes now, Defendant NONA TOBIN, an individual, in proper person, hereby files her OPPOSITION TO RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES’S MOTION TO DISMISS TOBIN’S COUNTER-CLAIMS AND
Nona Tobin’s Cross-claim vs. Nationstar and Wells Fargo
Link to 3/8/21 Nona Tobin’s answer to Red Rock Financial Services’s complaint for interpleader, affirmative defenses, counter-claim vs. Red Rock and cross-claims against Nationstar Mortgage
NRS 116.31164(3)(2013) vs. NRCP 22: Interpleader vs. HOA bylaws prohibiting delegation
NRS 116.31164(3) (2013) duties after the sale Rule 22. Interpleader (a) Grounds. (1) By a Plaintiff. Persons with claims that may expose a plaintiff to
Counter-claim vs. Red Rock Financial Services
Factual allegations Plaintiff RRFS knows that all the liens recorded related to named Defendants other than Nona Tobin, i.e., Republic Services, Wells Fargo, and Nationstar
Cause of Action: Conversion
According to Jay Young, Nevada Law Blog: In Nevada, the elements for a claim of conversion are: A distinct and intentional act of dominion by
Civil complaint against attorneys
Causes of Action: Abuse of process, civil conspiracy, fraud, and racketeering Link to PDF of 3/22/21 third-party complaint into A-21-828840-C & exhibits Exhibit 1: Cause