Complaint to State Bar of Nevada Ethics & Discipline Panel vs. Joseph Hong

3/4/21 Rejection of 2/14/21 complaint follows the State Bar’s pattern of refusing to investigate any member whose dues are paid

2/14/21 Complaint vs. Joseph Hong details

On 4/15/19 and 4/22/19, Hong served notice through the Odyssey system that the 4/23/19 hearing was continued to 5/7/19 so neither my counsel, Joe Coppedge, nor i attended.

Joseph Hong went anyway and Judge Kishner held the continued hearing after contacting dept 16 to get Melanie Morgan to show up. Hong told Kishner a bunch of lies about the court record and Judge Kishner refused to consider 935 pages of opposition to Hong & Morgan’s fraudulent side deal to settle the quiet title dispute without joining me as a necessary party.

I lost title to a $500,000 house I had inherited because Hong & Morgan ticked the court into not looking at the evidence or hearing any of my claims.

Then, because of opposing counsels’ trickery, I could not appeal the orders against me in 79295.

Judge Johnson then would not hear my case because all the attorneys ganged up on me and convinced her to dismiss my case on the grounds of res judicata and claims preclusion.

Then, Johnson sanctioned me for filing the A-19-799890-C complaint $3,455 per EDCR 7.60 to Hong & $8,949 as an NRS 18.010(2) sanction to Brittany Wood, the attorney for new defendants, that Hong’s clients sold the house to during the pendency of proceedings and while my lis pendens were on record.

Attachments
  1. Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct – excerpt implicated in Hong discipline
  2. Joseph Hong’s prior discipline in California and Nevada
  3. ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions excerpt for Hong
  4. 4/23/19 transcript of ex parte hearing
  5. Hong’s combined court filings in opposition to Tobin were unwarranted, abusive, and obstructed the administration of justice
  6. 7/29/19 MNTR was stricken, and so Judge Kishner never adjudicated Joseph Hong’s misconduct that precipitated the motion
  7. 7/22/19 MTD pursuant to NRS 38.310 was stricken and so Judge Kishner granted Hong’s requested relief despite their lack of compliance with NRS 38.310 and Judge Kishner’s lack of jurisdiction per NRS 38.310(2).
  8. 9/23/16 Tobin sworn affidavit that she had evidence that Hong’s clients did not have a valid deed and that Nationstar did not have a valid claim to be owed the 7/22/04 Hansen debt.
  9. 1/17/17 Nona Tobin declaration under penalty of perjury regarding the notary defects of the Jimijack deed
  10. 4/22/19 NTSO
  11. 4/23/19 transcript of ex parte hearing
  12. 1/28/21 NCJD complaint vs. Kishner
  13. 6/3/19 Nona Tobin’s EDCR 2.67 supplement rejected at calendar call
  14. 3/22/19 only clerk’s notice of hearing for the 4/23/19 hearing
  15. 6/5/19 Hong’s proposed FFCL annotated
  16. 6/3/19 Nona Tobin’s proposed FFCL rejected by court
  17. 6/3/19 Nona Tobin’s pre-trial memorandum -ignored by the court
  18. Ex parte 001-055 Kishner – Joseph Hong’s served notices allowed him to misrepresent the facts and derail my case
  19. 2/7/21 outline of Tobin NCJD claims
  20. 6/21/19 Nona Tobin declaration under penalty of perjury vs. Joseph Hong