At this hearing the SCA attorney said the petition against her was nothing under the law:
“and further explained the petition of no confidence is not something that exists under the law or under the Association’s governing documents. It is of no consequence. There’s nothing with associations hasn’t recognize these homeowners have no authority over removing her from her position of employment
John Ayler, attempting to rationalize why it would be contrary to the association’s interest to let the divorce court know the truth
This hearing was six days after:
Adam Clarkson & Sandy Seddon took over the recall election
Adam Clarkson unlawfully removed me from my elected Board seat
Adam Clarkson advised the Board to conceal my complaints against his law firm and Sandy Seddon
Our HOA attorney’s attempts to conceal Sandy Seddon’s records from discovery in her divorce occurred 18 days after:
SCA management received petitions against four directors calling for NRS 116.31136 elections to remove them from the Board
SCA management received a petition calling for a vote of no confidence against Sandy Seddon
SCA management withheld notice of the receipt of the petitions from the Board – or at least from me
General manager Sandy Seddon did not answer – only one of the Board members who was facing a recall petition answered
General Manager Sandy Seddon did not answer again knowing that she would be protected by the attorney and the four directors who also had petitions against them
John Ayler wrote a 2nd cease & desist letter ordering me not to criticize Sandy Seddon evidencing his complete misunderstanding of the facts and the law related to confidentiality and privilege
Our HOA attorney-debt collector represented Sandy Seddon in her divorce eight days after:
Clarkson denied me access to documents requested as a member of the Board attacking me, defaming me, and misquoting the law
Our HOA attorney-debt collector represented Sandy Seddon in her divorce one day after:
Sandy Seddon published Clarkson’s defamatory, legally-inaccurate explanation justifying my removal from the board – that I was profiting from being on the Board
