The State Bar of Nevada refused to investigate complaints of attorney misconduct without a court order.
Linked Table of Contents of Appellant’s Appendices in Nevada Supreme Court
case 84371
I asked the Supreme Court to order the State Bar to investigate because it was an undue hardship on the victim to get a court order.
The petition for Writs of Mandate vs. the State Bar of Nevada and the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline was supported by a 36 -volume appendix that contained all the evidence that had been submitted to the State Bar and the NCJC, but had not been investigated. The uninvestigated complaints are linked below.
| FILED DATE | TOBIN BATES NUMBER | DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION | NEVADA SUPREME COURT FILE NUMBER |
| 3/15/2022 | PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE NEVADA JUDICIAL AND PROFESSIONAL CODES OF CONDUCT | 22-08149 | |
| 3/15/2022 | PETITION FOR EXCESS PAGES | 22-08150 | |
| 3/15/2022 | EXPANDED TABLE OF CONTENTS OF APPENDIX VOLUMES 1-36 | 22-08152 | |
| 5/18/2022 | AMENDED PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE NEVADA JUDICIAL AND PROFESSIONAL CODES OF CONDUCT | 22-15670 | |
| VOLUME | APPENDIX VOLUME CONTENTS | ||
| 1 | 001 -104 | A-15-720032-C orders that were obtained by fraud | 22-08156 |
| 2 | 105 – 201 | A-19-799890-CANDA-21-828840-C ORDERS OBTAINED BY FRAUD | 22-08160 |
| 3 | 202-279 | 79295 AND 82294 ORDERS AND 1ST BAR REJECTED COMPLAINT | 22-08162 |
| 4 | 280-460 | 2ND AND 3RD BAR COMPLAINTS AND REJECTIONS | 22-08163 |
| 5 | 461-646 | NCJD COMPLAINT ATTACHMENTS 1-7 | 22-08164 |
| 6 | 647-828 | NCJD ATTACHMENTS 8-12 | 22-08165 |
| 7 | 829-946 | NCJD ATTACH 13 AND 14 NATIONSTAR AND EX PARTE | 22-08167 |
| 8 | 947-1157 | NCJD Attach 15 obstruction of forced litigation | 22-08168 |
| 9 | 1158-1284 | NCJD Attach 16 EX PARTE STRICKEN PART 1 | 22-08169 |
| 10 | 1285-1431 | NCJD Attach 16 EX PARTE STRICKEN PART2 | 22-08170 |
| 11 | 1432-1676 | NCJD Attach 16 190417 EVIDENCE EXHIBITS 1-3 STRICKEN PART 3 | 22-08171 |
| 12 | 1677-1823 | NCJD Attach 16 190417 EVIDENCE EXHIBITS 4-9 EX PARTE STRICKEN PART 4 | 22-08172 |
| 13 | 1824-1949 | NCJD Attach 16 190417 PROOFS OF SERVICE EX PARTE STRICKEN PART 5 | 22-08173 |
| 14 | 1950-2064 | NCJD Attach 16 EVIDENCE VS NATIONSTAR EX PARTE STRICKEN PART 6 | 22-08174 |
| 15 | 2058-2120 | NCJD Attach 16 ANNOTATED ORDERS AND COURT RECORD PART 7 | 22-08175 |
| 16 | 2121 -2299 | 4/24/19 MVAC PER NRCP 60(b) AND CMSJ vs all AND 6/17/19 Motion to intervene as individual per NRCP 24 UNHEARD PART 1 | 22-08176 |
| 17 | 2300-2492 | 6/17/19 Motion to intervene as individual per NRCP 24 unheard PART 2 | 22-08178 |
| 18 | 2493-2699 | 6/17/19 Motion to intervene as individual per NRCP 24 PART 3 AND 7/22/19 Motion for a new trial PER NRCP 54(b) AND NRCP 59(a)(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(F) PART 1 | 22-08179 |
| 19 | 2700-2919 | 7/22/19 Motion for a new Trial NRCP 54(b) AND NRCP 59(a)(1)(A)(B)(C)(D)(F) stricken PART 2 | 22-08180 |
| 20 | 2920-3037 | 7/29/29 motion to dismiss PER NRS 38.310.2; 8/7/19 COMPLAINT ABUSE OF PROCESS CLAIM VS. MORGAN, HONG & OCHOA @ 3025-3031 | 22-08181 |
| 21 | 3038-3168 | 3/8/21 NONA TOBIN’S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM VS. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, CROSS-CLAIMS VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC AND WELLS FARGO, N.A., AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS VS. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES AND NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, AND/OR NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE DBA MR. COOPER PURSUANT TO NRCP 11(b)(1)(2)(3) and/or (4), NRS 18.010(2), NRS 207.407(1), NRS 42.005 dismissed with prejudice per NRCP 12(b)(5) res judicata. | 22-08182 |
| 22 | 3169-3367 | NONA TOBIN S THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT 1. ABUSE OF PROCESS 2. RACKETEERING (NRS 207.360(9)(18)(29)(30)(35); NRS 207.390, NRS 207.400(1)(2) 3. FRAUD NRS 205.330, NRS 205.360, NRS 205.372, NRS 205.377, NRS 205.395, NRS 205.405, NRS 111.175 4. RESTITUTION AND RELIEF REQUESTED EXCEEDS $15,000 5. EXEMPLARY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES PURSUANT TO NRS 42.005, NRS 207.470(1) & (4) 6. SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO NRCP 11(b)(1-4); NRPC 3.1, 3.3, 3.4,3.5(b), 4.1, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 8.3, 8.4 vs. STEVEN B. SCOW; BRODY R. WIGHT; JOSEPH HONG; MELANIE MORGAN; DAVID OCHOA; BRITTANY WOOD withdrawn, not served within 120 days PART 1 | 22-08183 |
| 23 | 3368 – 3543 | NONA TOBIN S THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT 1. ABUSE OF PROCESS 2. RACKETEERING (NRS 207.360(9)(18)(29)(30)(35); NRS 207.390, NRS 207.400(1)(2) 3. FRAUD NRS 205.330, NRS 205.360, NRS 205.372, NRS 205.377, NRS 205.395, NRS 205.405, NRS 111.175 4. RESTITUTION AND RELIEF REQUESTED EXCEEDS $15,000 5. EXEMPLARY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES PURSUANT TO NRS 42.005, NRS 207.470(1) & (4) 6. SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO NRCP 11(b)(1-4); NRPC 3.1, 3.3, 3.4,3.5(b), 4.1, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 8.3, 8.4 vs. STEVEN B. SCOW; BRODY R. WIGHT; JOSEPH HONG; MELANIE MORGAN; DAVID OCHOA; BRITTANY WOOD (was withdrawn as it was not served within 120 days) PART 2; 4/12/21 Nona Tobin’s Amended Motion for an Order to Distribute Interpleaded Proceeds with Interest to Sole Claimant Nona Tobin; 4/15/21 Counter-Claimant & Cross-Claimant Nona Tobin’s Motion for Summary Judgment vs. Counter-Defendant Red Rock Financial Services and Cross¬Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC & Wells Fargo, N.A. and Motion for Punitive Damages and Sanctions Pursuant to NRCP 11 (b)(1)(2)(3) and/or(4), NRS 18.010(2), NRS 207.401(1) and/or NRS 42.005; 11/10/21 Nona Tobin’s Three-Day Notice of Intent to Take Default vs. Wells Fargo, N.A. as to Tobin’s Cross-Claims Filed on March 8, 2021; 11/10/21Nona Tobin’s Three-Day Notice of Intent to Take Default vs. Nationstar. as to Tobin’s Cross-Claims Filed on March 8, 2021 and 2/18/21, 5/11/21, 5/21/21, & 5/25/21 NCJD TOBIN COMMUNICATIONS | 22-08184 |
| 24 | 3544-3736 | 3/15/21 RFJN 2003-2019 PROPERTY RECORD PART 1 | 22-08185 |
| 25 | 3738-3939 | 3/15/21 RFJN 2020-2021 PROPERTY RECORD PART 2. | 22-08186 |
| 26 | 3940-4044 | 4/4/21 RFJN UNADJUDICATED CLAIMS; 4/7/21 RFJN LAWS 210409 NRCP 16.1 DISCLOSURES | 22-08187 DUPLICATE WAS REPLACED ON 4/12/22 BY 22-11463 |
| 27 | 4045-4154 | 2/23/22 BAR COMPLAINT VS. MELANIE MORGAN | 22-08189 |
| 28 | 4155-4259 | 2/28/22 WRIGHT FINLEY ZAK BAR COMPLAINT | 22-08190 |
| 29 | 4260-4354 | 3/2/22 STEVEN SCOW BAR COMPLAINT AND EX A FALSE EVIDENCE | 22-08191 |
| 30 | 4355- 4438 | STEVEN SCOW BAR COMPLAINT EX B-F RETAINED PROCEEDS | 22-08192 |
| 31 | 4439-4603 | STEVEN SCOW BAR COMPLAINT EXHIBITS F -H-5 | 22-08194 |
| 32 | 4604 – 4733 | BAR COMPLAINT VS. DAVID 3/6/22 OCHOA EXHIBITS A-D | 22-08195 |
| 33.1 | 4734 – 4847 | BAR COMPLAINT VS. OCHOA EXHIBITS E, E-1, E-2, 3-3 AND F | 22-08196 |
| 33.2 | ADDS INCORRECTLY NUMBERED EXHIBIT H-1 TO OCHOA EXHIBITS E, E-1, E-2, 3-3 AND F (4734-4847) | 22-08198 | |
| 34 | 4848 – 5046 | BAR COMPLAINT VS. OCHOA EXHIBITS G, G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, G-5, H, ONLINE RECEIPT | 22-08199 |
| 35 | 5047 – 5204 | PRO SE A-21-828840-C FAILED ATTEMPTS TO GET ORDER WITH WRITTEN FINDINGS OF ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT | 22-08200 |
| 36 | 5205 – 5282 | A-21-88840-C 8/19/21, 11/16/21, and 1/18/22 HEARING TRANSCRIPTS | 22-08218 |
| 26 CORRECTED | 3944-4044 | 4/4/21 RFJN UNADJUDICATED CLAIMS; 4/7/21 RFJN LAWS 210409 NRCP 16.1 DISCLOSURES OMITTED IN ERROR FROM THE COURT”S 84371 PUBLIC PORTAL. CORRECTED 4/12/22 | 22-11463 |
On 8/11/22, the Supreme Court ruled that an appeal was a speedy and adequate remedy for me, and there was no need its extraordinary intervention.
