Is a criminal-to-excellence measuring scale hard to understand?
It seems to be hard for the people currently in power here to grasp.
But, the association (meaning the membership) faces a very high risk if the Board, GM, and attorney are not held accountable for being ethical and fair.
With so much a secret, who can be held to account?
I invite you to look again at my blog, The Cautionary Tale of the City of Bell.
Although SCA is a non-profit corporation that privately delivers municipal services rather than a city per se, SCA has hallmarks that mirror the City of Bell’s textbook case of municipal corruption:
- laws are bent to serve executive’s private interests
- those in power act in concert for self-interest
- excessive executive compensation
- disenfranchising of unsophisticated and inattentive voters
- election interference
- lack of transparency
Mmm…how can I make this clearer?
I know. Let’s discuss a fun fact about bestiality.
Did you know that until AB 391 passed last year, and became effective October 1, 2017, it wasn’t against the law in Nevada to have sex with a dog?
It’s pretty weird that it wasn’t illegal until a few months ago, but, I think we can all agree that,
just because you could have, doesn’t mean you should have.
Let’s take this tale a step further.
…before Nevada’s anti-bestiality law passed, a neighbor was disturbed by the noise of a dog whining. When the neighbor realized what was happening, he complained around the neighborhood that such conduct should not be allowed.
The neighbor complained strenuously that it was cruel and abusive to the animal, and offensive to community values.
Instead of apologizing or showing any shame or remorse, the “dog lover” was rude and insulting to the neighbor, flaunting his “rights” and saying in an arrogant and condescending tone:
“Shut up. I can do to my dog whatever I want. I do not have to change my ways just because some whiner complains about having to witness how much I really love my dog. My attorney says the law is on my side. You have invaded my privacy and defamed me. I’ll tell everybody you are a horrible busybody, and they’ll hate you. I’m going to sue you, and you will have to pay all my attorney fees.”
Your Ethics 101 Exam Questions
- How would you rate the dog lover‘s behavior on a criminal-to-excellent-neighbor scale?
- How would you rate the neighbor’s behavior?
- Should the neighbor have to pay the attorney fees?
- How could this situation have been handled better?
Even if the selfish dog lover had not technically broken any Nevada law, I think we can all agree that he was wrong to abuse the dog, and that he made everything about the situation worse by unfairly stomping on the aghast neighbor.
The moral of this tale
What the Board, the GM, and the attorney did felt to me as exactly comparable to how the dog lover retaliated against his neighbor for complaining. They bullied me, shunned me, threatened me with litigation and liability for attorney fees for speaking up when I saw things that were just plain wrong – just like the dog lover treated his neighbor.
SCA leaders must be held to a higher standard.
You can help. Vote. Raise our standards.
Bob Burch and Aletta Waterhouse should not be re-elected just because they have not had sex with their dogs.